Rishi Sunak, the UK’s chancellor, on Sunday played down the impact of a “no trade deal” Brexit, but his tough talk came as Boris Johnson was on standby to make a push to get an agreement over the line.
UK and EU officials believe a deal is within grasp and that this week’s negotiations are crucial. One EU diplomat said there would be a “breakthrough or breakdown” by the weekend.
British officials said Mr Johnson may speak to Ursula von der Leyen, European Commission president, later in the week to try to unlock the talks, which remain stuck on familiar issues of fisheries and a “level playing field” for competition between the UK and EU.
“They may well talk, but nothing is scheduled,” said one British official, adding that negotiations might continue over the weekend if a deal looks possible early next week. “We aren’t quite at the point where leaders get involved,” the official said.
Mr Sunak declined to say what modelling the Treasury had conducted on the economic impact of leaving the EU without a trade deal when Britain’s transition period ends on January 1, suggesting the effects would mainly be in the short term.
Some government officials believe Mr Sunak fully expects a deal to be agreed and that his comments were intended to remind EU negotiators that Britain was prepared to walk away from the talks. The chancellor said the UK would “not accept a deal at any price”.
But David Gauke, a former Treasury minister, said “history will not judge kindly” cabinet members who failed to warn of the serious economic damage a hard Brexit with no trade deal would cause.
“The ambitious among them know that to be seen to be associated with compromise on Brexit is a career damaging move,” Mr Gauke wrote on the ConservativeHome website. “They keep their heads down, content to let others challenge the prejudices of their party’s more extreme supporters.”
Mr Sunak told the BBC’s Andrew Marr programme on Sunday that “in the short term specifically and most immediately it would be preferable to have a deal because it would ease things in the short term”.
But he added: “I think the most important impact on our economy next year is not going to be from that. It’s because of coronavirus. I’m very confident about the British economy in all circumstances, and I think longer term.”
However, Anton Spisak, a former UK civil servant working on Brexit, wrote on Twitter: “True, the costs will be *most visible* in January. But the *biggest* costs will be in the medium/long term: supply chains shifted; client operations moved elsewhere; investments cancelled.”
Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, remains in self-isolation along with senior members of his team, after one of the top EU officials involved in the talks tested positive for Covid-19 last week.
EU officials said discussions would continue in virtual format this week, with British officials hoping face-to-face talks could resume at the end of the week.
Both sides remain hopeful a deal can be struck, with British officials saying the break in physical talks could be “a good thing” because it would give exhausted negotiators a chance to take stock.
One EU diplomat noted that Brussels was running into procedural complications because of the talks dragging on: there was already too little time for EU institutions to be able to translate a deal into all of the bloc’s 24 official languages ahead of a European Parliament ratification vote in the week of December 14 — the assembly’s last scheduled session of the year.
The diplomat said that workarounds were being explored and MEPs have already indicated that they are prepared to hold a vote closer to the end of the year to buy more time for talks.